In Royal Indemnity Co.v.Tyco Fire Products,LP,the case in the text,why did the high court of Virginia affirm the trial court's judgment?
A) Tyco did not provide an express warranty of future performance for an indefinite period of time.
B) The technical data sheet contained an express warranty of future performance.
C) Royal's delay was excused because of the discovery rule.
D) The record indicated that the language of the technical data sheet became part of the basis of the bargain.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q71: Which of the following is not an
Q72: John buys a machine for $10,000 under
Q73: _ is the plaintiff's voluntary consent to
Q74: The case in the text,Giddings & Lewis,Inc.v.Industrial
Q75: In the case in the text,Branham v.Ford
Q77: Jason sold Sally a car manufactured by
Q78: As demonstrated by the case in the
Q79: In a chain of distribution involving defective
Q80: Which of the following requires that certain
Q81: Which of the following is not a
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents