In the case in the text,Branham v.Ford Motor Co. ,the court stated that the plaintiff was required to prove three things at trial for his product liability design defect action.Which of the following is not one of the three requirements?
A) Evidence of a reasonable alternative design
B) The defendant knew the product was dangerous
C) A design flaw in the product
D) How an alterative design would have prevented the product from being unreasonably dangerous
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q70: Adam decides to eat food despite knowing
Q71: Which of the following is not an
Q72: John buys a machine for $10,000 under
Q73: _ is the plaintiff's voluntary consent to
Q74: The case in the text,Giddings & Lewis,Inc.v.Industrial
Q76: In Royal Indemnity Co.v.Tyco Fire Products,LP,the case
Q77: Jason sold Sally a car manufactured by
Q78: As demonstrated by the case in the
Q79: In a chain of distribution involving defective
Q80: Which of the following requires that certain
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents