In the case in the text,Bissinger v.New Country Buffet,what was one reason why the intermediate court held that the trial court's decision to grant the suppliers' motion for summary judgment was proper?
A)The suppliers' labels were insufficient because they failed to mention death as a potential risk.
B)The suppliers' labels were insufficient to meet the reasonable care standard.
C)The suppliers had no ability to directly warn customers of restaurants.
D)The suppliers were responsible because the object found in the food did not naturally occur in that food.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

One of the reasons why the court found in favor of the suppliers was because they had no ability to directly warn customers of restaurants that bought oysters from them,they could not be held to have breached a duty to warn the eventual consumer of its products.

In the Case in the Text,Bissinger V