In the case in the text,Wilke v.Woodhouse Ford,Inc. ,the court held that:
A)the plaintiff failed to prove that the defendant was negligent for failure to inspect the van.
B)the defendant was liable because it negligently failed to inspect the van.
C)the implied warranty disclaimer did not violate public policy.
D)the implied warranty disclaimer violated public policy because the plaintiff suffered personal injury.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The court upheld an implied warranty disclaimer and declined to hold that the disclaimer violated public policy even though one of the plaintiffs suffered personal injury.The court emphasized,however,that the implied warranty disclaimer would not have protected the defendant against possible liability for negligent failure to inspect the van before selling it to the plaintiffs.

In the Case in the Text,Wilke V