The case in the text,Lincoln Composites,Inc.v.Firetrace USA,LLC,which of the following was not a holding of the court?
A)The jury failed to support its verdict with mathematical certainty and the award was reversed.
B)Lincoln presented sufficient evidence for the jury's consequential damages award,which included the cost of travel and labor expenses it incurred and would incur in the future to replace the tubing.
C)The jury's verdict was not against the great weight of evidence as to rise to the level of miscarriage of justice or so excessive as to shock the judicial conscience.
D)The jury instruction was a correct statement of law and recognized the key issue to decide was whether Firetrace was given a reasonable amount of time to fix the defects.

Question

The case in the text,Lincoln Composites,Inc.v.Firetrace USA,LLC,which of the following was not a holding of the court?
A)The jury failed to support its verdict with mathematical certainty and the award was reversed.
B)Lincoln presented sufficient evidence for the jury's consequential damages award,which included the cost of travel and labor expenses it incurred and would incur in the future to replace the tubing.
C)The jury's verdict was not against the great weight of evidence as to rise to the level of miscarriage of justice or so excessive as to shock the judicial conscience.
D)The jury instruction was a correct statement of law and recognized the key issue to decide was whether Firetrace was given a reasonable amount of time to fix the defects.

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

(1)Lincoln presented sufficient evidence as to the cost of travel and labor expenses it has incurred and will incur in the future to replace the Firetrace tubing to support the consequential damages awarded by the jury; (2)the jury's verdict is not so against the great weight of the evidence as to rise to the level of a miscarriage of justice or so excessive as to shock the judicial conscience;and (3)the court's jury instruction was a correct statement of Nebraska law and recognized that the key issue for the jury to decide was whether Firetrace was given a reasonable amount of time in which to correct defects in the tubing.

The Case in the Text,Lincoln Composites,Inc