In Green v.Ford Motor Co. ,the case in the text,the Indiana Supreme Court held that in crashworthiness cases alleging enhanced injuries:
A)the plaintiff's alleged negligence in operating the vehicle was not relevant in determining whether Ford negligently designed the restrain system.
B)a finder of fact shall apportion fault to the person suffering physical harm when that alleged fault relates to the cause of the underlying accident.
C)if the plaintiff is found to be negligent,then he is barred from any recovery.
D)the plaintiff's alleged negligence is considered,regardless of whether it was the proximate cause of the injuries he sustained.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The court held that in a crashworthiness case alleging enhanced injuries under the Indiana Product Liability Act,it is the function of the fact-finder to consider and evaluate the conduct of all relevant actors who are alleged to have caused or contributed to cause the harm for which the plaintiff seeks damages.

In Green V