Solved

The Distinction Between the Necessary Proofs Under Title VII and IRCA

Question 22

Multiple Choice

The distinction between the necessary proofs under Title VII and IRCA for a case alleging disparate impact is:

A) under Title VII,proof must be by a preponderance of the evidence,while under IRCA,proof must be beyond a reasonable doubt.
B) under Title VII,the plaintiff must prove that discrimination was willful and knowing,whereas,under IRCA,the discrimination need not be proved to have been intentional.
C) under Title VII,the plaintiff need not prove that discrimination was intentional,whereas,under IRCA,the discrimination must be proved to have been willful and knowing.
D) under IRCA,proof must be by a preponderance of the evidence,while under Title VII,proof must be beyond a reasonable doubt.

Correct Answer: