What was the result in the case in the text Lucy v.Zehmer involving whether allegations of joking prevented the formation of the contract involved?
A) The court ruled that the contract would not be enforced because one of the parties was subjectively joking.
B) The court ruled that the contract would not be enforced because one of the parties was joking, and a reasonable person should have known that.
C) The court ruled that the contract would not be enforced because the parties had been drinking although they were not intoxicated.
D) The court ruled that the agreement would be enforced because under the applicable standard, it was not apparent that joking was involved.
E) The court ruled that the contract would be enforced because of what the parties verbally said regardless of whether an objective person would have thought joking was involved.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q10: The _ terms of a contract are
Q10: Only the offeree to whom an offer
Q12: Which of the following was the result
Q13: An "instructed authorization" occurs if the means
Q16: Under the Mailbox Rule,a valid contract has
Q17: Once an offer is made,an offeror has
Q18: An offer by a retailer to purchase
Q19: If the subject matter of an offer
Q21: Which of the following terms would be
Q29: What was the result in the case
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents