What was the result in the case discussed in the text Andrus v.State Department of Transportation,and City of Olympia in which the plaintiff sued because a job offer was allegedly revoked?
A) The plaintiff won because the city had validly offered him a job and had no right to revoke it.
B) The plaintiff won because, while there was no contract, the court ruled that the city was not allowed to mislead him on equitable grounds and also on grounds of unlawful discrimination.
C) The defendant won because it had truly received a bad reference.
D) The defendant won because the plaintiff had not specifically accepted the job.
E) The defendant won because the purported job offer contained insufficient information to be considered reasonably certain in regard to its terms.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q3: If nothing is stated to the contrary
Q4: If an acceptance is received after a
Q4: If an offeree makes a mistake and
Q5: Constance asks Kathy if Kathy would consider
Q9: Courts interpret contracts using an objective standard.
Q10: Only the offeree to whom an offer
Q10: The _ terms of a contract are
Q17: What was the result in the Opening
Q28: In an auction _, the seller is
Q29: What was the result in the case
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents