In Chattler v. U.S., a passport applicant claimed that the government breached its contract with her when it failed to process her application in a timely manner, even after she paid a fee for expedited processing. Chattler asserted that the expedited process was a valid offer that she accepted by paying the $60 fee. How did the court rule, and what must be present to find mutual assent?

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The Answer of In Chattler v. U.S., a passport applicant claimed that the government breached its contract with her when it failed to process her application in a timely manner, even after she paid a fee for expedited processing. Chattler asserted that the expedited process was a valid offer that she accepted by paying the $60 fee. How did the court rule, and what must be present to find mutual assent?

In Chattler V