While Aros Inc.incurs a cost of $20 for a pair of shoes, Shoes Cult Inc., its competitor, manufactures a pair of shoes at $22.Both the companies are able to sell their shoes for a maximum of $30 per pair.Which of the following statements is NOT true in this scenario?
A) Both Aros and Shoes Cult have achieved differentiation parity.
B) Aros is a cost leader when compared to Shoes Cult.
C) Aros has created a greater economic value than Shoes Cult.
D) Shoes Cult has a competitive advantage over Aros.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q21: When a firm manufactures 2,000-3,000 units of
Q22: Oviyo Inc.has been successful at differentiating itself
Q23: Which of the following factors contributes to
Q24: Coral Orchids is a chain of premium
Q27: To be cost-competitive,a firm should
A) position itself
Q28: In contrast to a differentiator, a cost
Q30: Economies of scale do NOT allow firms
Q39: When a firm operates at the minimum
Q44: _ is best described as the output
Q47: _ is best described as decreases in
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents