As a result of the fact that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 had been amended in 1991 to include "motivating factor" language but that the ADEA (Age Discrimination in Employment Act)had not,the U.S.Supreme Court said that:

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

As a result of the fact that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 had been amended in 1991 to include "motivating factor" language but that the ADEA (Age Discrimination in Employment Act) had not, the U.S. Supreme Court said that no burden shifting occurs in ADEA cases. In fact, the decision means that mixed-motives age discrimination claims do not exist under the ADEA for disparate treatment claims.

As a Result of the Fact That Title VII of the Civil