Carl was employed as a chief architect with Splendid Infrastructure Inc.in Winston-Salem,North Carolina.He signed a covenant not to compete when he was hired two years ago.The agreement states that Carl cannot work with Splendid Infrastructure's competitors in the state of North Carolina for one year in case his employment with the company ends.Carl's employer finds out that Carl has been working part-time for himself,and is immediately terminated.Carl now wants to be an architect with Harold's Structures Inc.in Greensboro,North Carolina.Which of the following is true of this scenario?
A) Carl can take up the new job without any restrictions because he did not voluntarily quit his job at Splendid Infrastructure Inc.
B) Carl can take up the new job without any restrictions because a covenant not to compete is only valid for six months, and Carl had signed the agreement two years ago.
C) Carl cannot take up the new job if the location and time restrictions in the not-to-compete agreement are deemed to be reasonable by a court.
D) Carl cannot take up the new job because he was terminated from Splendid Infrastructure Inc., which makes him ineligible for a new job for the next two years.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q22: Under the common-law agency test,the most critical
Q42: Cara's employer intentionally misclassifies her as an
Q43: Patty worked as a chief chef in
Q44: Which of the following refers to a
Q44: Under the theory of inevitable disclosure,courts:
A) allow
Q45: What are the main factors when determining
Q48: To be enforceable by a court,a non-compete
Q49: Describe how the freedom to contract is
Q49: List the four criteria that must be
Q50: What are the qualifications for a valid
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents