Services
Discover
Homeschooling
Ask a Question
Log in
Sign up
Filters
Done
Question type:
Essay
Multiple Choice
Short Answer
True False
Matching
Topic
Business
Study Set
Managerial Accounting Study Set 4
Quiz 5: Activity-Based Costing and Management
Path 4
Access For Free
Share
All types
Filters
Study Flashcards
Question 21
Multiple Choice
Jackson Company manufactures products X and Y, applying overhead on the basis of labour hours. X, a low-volume product, requires a variety of complex manufacturing procedures. Y, on the other hand, is both a high-volume product and relatively simplistic in nature. What would an activity-based costing system likely disclose about products X and Y as a result of Jackson's current accounting procedures?
X
‾
Y
‾
1
Undercosted
Undercosted
2
Undercosted
Overcosted
3
Overcosted
Undercosied
4
Overcosted
Overcosted
5
Costed correctly
Costed correctly
\begin{array} { | l | l | l | } \hline & { \underline { X } } & { \underline { Y } } \\\hline 1 & \text { Undercosted } & \text { Undercosted } \\\hline 2 & \text { Undercosted } & \text { Overcosted } \\\hline 3 & \text { Overcosted } & \text { Undercosied } \\\hline 4 & \text { Overcosted } & \text { Overcosted } \\\hline 5 & \text { Costed correctly } & \text { Costed correctly } \\\hline\end{array}
1
2
3
4
5
X
Undercosted
Undercosted
Overcosted
Overcosted
Costed correctly
Y
Undercosted
Overcosted
Undercosied
Overcosted
Costed correctly
Question 22
Multiple Choice
X-Ray Machines Ltd. manufactures three product lines: Standard, Deluxe, and Superior. The company, which uses activity-based costing, has identified five activities (and related cost drivers) . Each activity, its budgeted cost, and related cost driver is identified below. The following information pertains to the three product lines for next year:
Standard
Deluxe
Supe rior
Units to be produced
15
,
000
10
,
000
7
,
000
Orders to be shipped
1
,
000
500
500
Number of parts per unit
10
15
25
Machine hours per unit
3
5
7
Labour hours per unit
2
2
2
\begin{array}{|l|r|r|r|}\hline & \text { Standard } & \text { Deluxe } & \text { Supe rior } \\\hline \text { Units to be produced } & 15,000 & 10,000 & 7,000 \\\hline \text { Orders to be shipped } & 1,000 & 500 & 500 \\\hline \text { Number of parts per unit } & 10 & 15 & 25 \\\hline \text { Machine hours per unit } & 3 & 5 & 7 \\\hline \text { Labour hours per unit } & 2 & 2 & 2 \\\hline\end{array}
Units to be produced
Orders to be shipped
Number of parts per unit
Machine hours per unit
Labour hours per unit
Standard
15
,
000
1
,
000
10
3
2
Deluxe
10
,
000
500
15
5
2
Supe rior
7
,
000
500
25
7
2
Assume that X-Ray is using a volume-based costing system, and the preceding manufacturing costs are applied to all products based on direct labour hours. How much of the preceding cost, rounded to the nearest dollar, would be assigned to Deluxe?
Question 23
Multiple Choice
Grossman Enterprises is converting to an activity-based costing system and needs to depict the various activities in its manufacturing process along with the activities' relationships. Which of the following is a possible tool that the company can use to accomplish this task?
Question 24
Multiple Choice
X-Ray Machines Ltd. manufactures three product lines: Standard, Deluxe, and Superior. The company, which uses activity-based costing, has identified five activities (and related cost drivers) . Each activity, its budgeted cost, and related cost driver is identified below. The following information pertains to the three product lines for next year:
Standard
Deluxe
Supe rior
Units to be produced
15
,
000
10
,
000
7
,
000
Orders to be shipped
1
,
000
500
500
Number of parts per unit
10
15
25
Machine hours per unit
3
5
7
Labour hours per unit
2
2
2
\begin{array}{|l|r|r|r|}\hline & \text { Standard } & \text { Deluxe } & \text { Supe rior } \\\hline \text { Units to be produced } & 15,000 & 10,000 & 7,000 \\\hline \text { Orders to be shipped } & 1,000 & 500 & 500 \\\hline \text { Number of parts per unit } & 10 & 15 & 25 \\\hline \text { Machine hours per unit } & 3 & 5 & 7 \\\hline \text { Labour hours per unit } & 2 & 2 & 2 \\\hline\end{array}
Units to be produced
Orders to be shipped
Number of parts per unit
Machine hours per unit
Labour hours per unit
Standard
15
,
000
1
,
000
10
3
2
Deluxe
10
,
000
500
15
5
2
Supe rior
7
,
000
500
25
7
2
Under an activity-based costing system, what is the per-unit cost of Deluxe?
Question 25
Multiple Choice
Activity-based costing systems:
Question 26
Multiple Choice
Consumption ratios are useful in determining:
Question 27
Multiple Choice
St. James, Inc., currently uses traditional costing procedures, applying $800,000 of overhead to products Beta and Zeta on the basis of direct labour hours. The company is considering a shift to activity-based costing and the creation of individual cost pools that will use direct labour hours (DLH) , production setups (SU) , and number of parts components (PC) as cost drivers. Data on the cost pools and respective driver volumes follow.
Product
Pool No. 1
(Driver: DLH)
Pool No. 2
(Driver: SU)
Pool No. 3
(Driver: PC)
Beta
1.200
45
2.250
Zeta
2.800
55
750
Pool
Cost
$
160
,
000
$
280
,
000
$
360
,
000
\begin{array} { | c | c | c | c | } \hline \text { Product } & \begin{array} { c } \text { Pool No. 1 } \\\text { (Driver: DLH) }\end{array} & \begin{array} { c } \text { Pool No. 2 } \\\text { (Driver: SU) }\end{array} & \begin{array} { c } \text { Pool No. 3 } \\\text { (Driver: PC) }\end{array} \\\hline \text { Beta } & 1.200 & 45 & 2.250 \\\hline \text { Zeta } & 2.800 & 55 & 750 \\\hline & & & \\\hline \begin{array} { c } \text { Pool } \\\text { Cost }\end{array} & \$ 160,000 & \$ 280,000 & \$ 360,000 \\\hline\end{array}
Product
Beta
Zeta
Pool
Cost
Pool No. 1
(Driver: DLH)
1.200
2.800
$160
,
000
Pool No. 2
(Driver: SU)
45
55
$280
,
000
Pool No. 3
(Driver: PC)
2.250
750
$360
,
000
The overhead cost allocated to Beta by using traditional costing procedures would be:
Question 28
Multiple Choice
During a recent accounting period, Marty's shipping department processed 26 orders. Each order typically takes four hours to complete; however, the average time increased to five hours because of various departmental inefficiencies. If shipping labour is paid $14 per hour, the company's non-value-added cost would be:
Question 29
Multiple Choice
Dreyfus Manufacturing sells a number of goods whose selling price is heavily influenced by cost. A recent study of product no. 519 revealed a traditionally-derived total cost of $1,019, a selling price of $1,850 based on that figure, and a newly computed activity-based total cost of $1,215. Which of the following statements is true?
Question 30
Multiple Choice
In comparison with a system that uses a single volume-based cost driver, an activity-based costing system is preferred when a company has:
Question 31
Multiple Choice
St. James, Inc., currently uses traditional costing procedures, applying $800,000 of overhead to products Beta and Zeta on the basis of direct labour hours. The company is considering a shift to activity-based costing and the creation of individual cost pools that will use direct labour hours (DLH) , production setups (SU) , and number of parts components (PC) as cost drivers. Data on the cost pools and respective driver volumes follow.
Product
Pool No. 1
(Driver: DLH)
Pool No. 2
(Driver: SU)
Pool No. 3
(Driver: PC)
Beta
1.200
45
2.250
Zeta
2.800
55
750
Pool
Cost
$
160
,
000
$
280
,
000
$
360
,
000
\begin{array} { | c | c | c | c | } \hline \text { Product } & \begin{array} { c } \text { Pool No. 1 } \\\text { (Driver: DLH) }\end{array} & \begin{array} { c } \text { Pool No. 2 } \\\text { (Driver: SU) }\end{array} & \begin{array} { c } \text { Pool No. 3 } \\\text { (Driver: PC) }\end{array} \\\hline \text { Beta } & 1.200 & 45 & 2.250 \\\hline \text { Zeta } & 2.800 & 55 & 750 \\\hline & & & \\\hline \begin{array} { c } \text { Pool } \\\text { Cost }\end{array} & \$ 160,000 & \$ 280,000 & \$ 360,000 \\\hline\end{array}
Product
Beta
Zeta
Pool
Cost
Pool No. 1
(Driver: DLH)
1.200
2.800
$160
,
000
Pool No. 2
(Driver: SU)
45
55
$280
,
000
Pool No. 3
(Driver: PC)
2.250
750
$360
,
000
The overhead cost allocated to Zeta by using traditional costing procedures would be:
Question 32
Multiple Choice
St. James, Inc., currently uses traditional costing procedures, applying $800,000 of overhead to products Beta and Zeta on the basis of direct labour hours. The company is considering a shift to activity-based costing and the creation of individual cost pools that will use direct labour hours (DLH) , production setups (SU) , and number of parts components (PC) as cost drivers. Data on the cost pools and respective driver volumes follow.
Product
Pool No. 1
(Driver: DLH)
Pool No. 2
(Driver: SU)
Pool No. 3
(Driver: PC)
Beta
1.200
45
2.250
Zeta
2.800
55
750
Pool
Cost
$
160
,
000
$
280
,
000
$
360
,
000
\begin{array} { | c | c | c | c | } \hline \text { Product } & \begin{array} { c } \text { Pool No. 1 } \\\text { (Driver: DLH) }\end{array} & \begin{array} { c } \text { Pool No. 2 } \\\text { (Driver: SU) }\end{array} & \begin{array} { c } \text { Pool No. 3 } \\\text { (Driver: PC) }\end{array} \\\hline \text { Beta } & 1.200 & 45 & 2.250 \\\hline \text { Zeta } & 2.800 & 55 & 750 \\\hline & & & \\\hline \begin{array} { c } \text { Pool } \\\text { Cost }\end{array} & \$ 160,000 & \$ 280,000 & \$ 360,000 \\\hline\end{array}
Product
Beta
Zeta
Pool
Cost
Pool No. 1
(Driver: DLH)
1.200
2.800
$160
,
000
Pool No. 2
(Driver: SU)
45
55
$280
,
000
Pool No. 3
(Driver: PC)
2.250
750
$360
,
000
The overhead cost allocated to Zeta by using activity-based costing procedures would be:
Question 33
Multiple Choice
Oliver and Sprung, an accounting firm, provides tax compliance and tax planning services. A recent analysis found that 65% of the firm's billable hours to clients resulted from tax planning and for many years, the firm's total administrative cost (currently $300,000) has been allocated to services on this basis. The firm, contemplating a change to activity-based costing, has identified three components of administrative cost, as follows:
Staff Support
$
215
,
000
In-house IT charges
65
,
000
Miscellaneous office expenditures
20
,
000
$
300
,
000
\begin{array} { | l | r r | } \hline \text { Staff Support } & \$ \quad 215,000 \\\hline \text { In-house IT charges } & 65,000 \\\hline \text { Miscellaneous office expenditures } & 20,000 \\\hline & \$ 300,000 \\\hline\end{array}
Staff Support
In-house IT charges
Miscellaneous office expenditures
$
215
,
000
65
,
000
20
,
000
$300
,
000
A recent analysis of staff support found a strong correlation with the number of clients served. In contrast, in-house IT and miscellaneous office expenditures varied directly with the number of computer hours logged and number of client transactions, respectively. Tax compliance clients served totaled 25% of the total client base, consumed 35% of the firm's computer hours, and accounted for 30% of the total client transactions. If Oliver and Sprung switched from its current accounting method to an activity-based costing system, the amount of administrative cost chargeable to tax compliance services would:
Question 34
Multiple Choice
St. James, Inc., currently uses traditional costing procedures, applying $800,000 of overhead to products Beta and Zeta on the basis of direct labour hours. The company is considering a shift to activity-based costing and the creation of individual cost pools that will use direct labour hours (DLH) , production setups (SU) , and number of parts components (PC) as cost drivers. Data on the cost pools and respective driver volumes follow.
Product
Pool No. 1
(Driver: DLH)
Pool No. 2
(Driver: SU)
Pool No. 3
(Driver: PC)
Beta
1.200
45
2.250
Zeta
2.800
55
750
Pool
Cost
$
160
,
000
$
280
,
000
$
360
,
000
\begin{array} { | c | c | c | c | } \hline \text { Product } & \begin{array} { c } \text { Pool No. 1 } \\\text { (Driver: DLH) }\end{array} & \begin{array} { c } \text { Pool No. 2 } \\\text { (Driver: SU) }\end{array} & \begin{array} { c } \text { Pool No. 3 } \\\text { (Driver: PC) }\end{array} \\\hline \text { Beta } & 1.200 & 45 & 2.250 \\\hline \text { Zeta } & 2.800 & 55 & 750 \\\hline & & & \\\hline \begin{array} { c } \text { Pool } \\\text { Cost }\end{array} & \$ 160,000 & \$ 280,000 & \$ 360,000 \\\hline\end{array}
Product
Beta
Zeta
Pool
Cost
Pool No. 1
(Driver: DLH)
1.200
2.800
$160
,
000
Pool No. 2
(Driver: SU)
45
55
$280
,
000
Pool No. 3
(Driver: PC)
2.250
750
$360
,
000
The overhead cost allocated to Beta by using activity-based costing procedures would be:
Question 35
Multiple Choice
Vanguard combines all manufacturing overhead into a single cost pool and allocates this overhead to products by using machine hours. Activity-based costing would likely show that with Vanguard's current procedures: