(Consider This) For people that use commitment contracts to motivate achievement of a goal,people have the choice of their penalty money (from failing to reach the goal) to go to either charities they like or charities they hate (anti-charities) .From a behavioral economics perspective:
A) designating an anti-charity should be more effective because loss aversion will provide additional motivation.
B) designating a charity (versus an anti-charity) should be more effective because it avoids all potential for loss.
C) it shouldn't matter whether one designates a charity or an anti-charity.
D) self-interest biases generally keep people from choosing the anti-charity.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1: According to behavioral economics, temptation to make
Q4: Placement of goods in grocery and other
Q6: Heuristics generally help people make faster decisions.
Q9: Neoclassical theory suggests that to the extent
Q16: Behavioral economics recognizes that people frequently make
Q20: Neoclassical economics and behavioral economics both recognize
Q106: (Consider This)The website Stickk.com appeals to what
Q108: (Last Word)Participation in company retirement savings programs
Q114: (Consider This) The hedonic treadmill refers to
Q119: (Last Word) "Nudges" refer to
A) subtle changes
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents