In PGA Tour,Inc

In PGA Tour,Inc.v.Martin,Martin was a golfer who sought accommodation under the Americans with Disabilities Act for a recognized disability which caused pain due to restricted blood flow between his legs and heart.He asked to use a cart which would then permit him to play full rounds of golf.The PGA responded that its rules prohibited carts during tournament play and that allowing cart use would fundamentally change the game.The court determined that:

A) Martin should be allowed to use the cart because it provided him with little or no advantage under the circumstances and such an accommodation was not unreasonable nor did it fundamentally change the game.
B) Martin should be allowed to use the cart because carts are used at country clubs where strict rules of golf are required so the PGA ban was arbitrary and discriminatory.
C) Martin should not be allowed to use the cart because having one player using a cart and banning all others discriminates against the other players.
D) Martin should not be allowed to use the cart because there were other accommodations offered by the PGA which were reasonable and Martin had no right to reject them