Why has the contributory negligence defense been replaced with a comparative negligence theory in most states?
A)Because of situations in which a defendant is released from liability based on the last clear chance doctrine when equity requires that the defendant bear at least some responsibility.
B)Because of situations in which a plaintiff is barred from recovery due to minimal contributory negligence.
C)In order to assist a defendant in defending against unfounded claims.
D)In order to assist a plaintiff in avoiding the assumption of the risk doctrine.
E)In order to assist a defendant in avoiding the assumption of the risk doctrine.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

A)Because of many situations in which an extremely careless defendant causes a great deal of harm to a plaintiff who is barred from recovery due to minimal contributory negligence,most states have replaced the contributory negligence defense with either pure or modified comparative negligence.
B)Because of many situations in which an extremely careless defendant causes a great deal of harm to a plaintiff who is barred from recovery due to minimal contributory negligence,most states have replaced the contributory negligence defense with either pure or modified comparative negligence.
C)Because of many situations in which an extremely careless defendant causes a great deal of harm to a plaintiff who is barred from recovery due to minimal contributory negligence,most states have replaced the contributory negligence defense with either pure or modified comparative negligence.
D)Because of many situations in which an extremely careless defendant causes a great deal of harm to a plaintiff who is barred from recovery due to minimal contributory negligence,most states have replaced the contributory negligence defense with either pure or modified comparative negligence.
E)Because of many situations in which an extremely careless defendant causes a great deal of harm to a plaintiff who is barred from recovery due to minimal contributory negligence,most states have replaced the contributory negligence defense with either pure or modified comparative negligence.

Why Has the Contributory Negligence Defense Been Replaced with a Comparative