What was the final result on appeal in the Case Opener involving whether the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur applied to the lawsuit brought against landowners after the plaintiff fell through a wooden dock located on the defendants' property?
A) That the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur did not apply because it only applies in contractual cases.
B) That the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur applied.
C) That the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur did not apply because there was insufficient proof that the type of accident at issue would not normally happen in the absence of negligence.
D) That the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur did not apply because there was insufficient proof that the dock at issue was in the exclusive control of the defendants.
E) That whether or not the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur applied should be decided by the jury.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q56: Which of the following is a plaintiff
Q57: Why has the contributory negligence defense been
Q58: Which of the following applies to cases
Q59: What is the final required element of
Q60: Darryl is jaywalking in a jurisdiction that
Q62: [Diving Fiasco] Rogerio,who owns a dive shop
Q63: Which of the following is an example
Q64: Is Teresa the proximate cause of the
Q65: In reference to the case in the
Q66: Why do superseding causes allow defendants to
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents