Why do superseding causes allow defendants to avoid liability?
A)Superseding causes are an example of the res ipsa loquitor defense.
B)Superseding causes are evidence that a defendant's duty of care was fulfilled and thus no negligence occurred.
C)Superseding causes are evidence that a defendant's breach of duty was not the proximate cause of the plaintiff's injuries.
D)Superseding causes demonstrate the plaintiff was actually responsible for his own injuries.
E)Superseding causes do not allow defendants to avoid liability

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

A)Superseding causes allow a defendant to avoid liability because they are
evidence the defendant's breach of duty was not the proximate cause of the plaintiff's injuries.
B)Superseding causes allow a defendant to avoid liability because they are evidence the defendant's breach of duty was not the proximate cause of the plaintiff's injuries.
C)Superseding causes allow a defendant to avoid liability because they are evidence the defendant's breach of duty was not the proximate cause of the plaintiff's injuries.
D)Superseding causes allow a defendant to avoid liability because they are evidence the defendant's breach of duty was not the proximate cause of the plaintiff's injuries.
E)Superseding causes allow a defendant to avoid liability because they are evidence the defendant's breach of duty was not the proximate cause of the plaintiff's injuries.

Why Do Superseding Causes Allow Defendants to Avoid Liability