Did Rogerio have a duty to provide assistance to Tamika and Billy during the dive?
A)Rogerio had a duty to come to their assistance only if no one else did so.
B)Rogerio had a duty to come to their assistance only if they were minors.
C)Rogerio had a duty to come to their assistance only if he had specifically agreed to do so prior to the dive.
D)Rogerio had a duty to come to their aid because he arranged the dive and was charging them.
E)Rogerio had no duty to provide any assistance to them.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

A)The courts generally hold that businesses have a duty of care to protect their
customers against foreseeable risks about which the owner knew or reasonably should have known.
B)The courts generally hold that businesses have a duty of care to protect their customers against foreseeable risks about which the owner knew or reasonably should have known.
C)The courts generally hold that businesses have a duty of care to protect their customers against foreseeable risks about which the owner knew or reasonably should have known.
D)The courts generally hold that businesses have a duty of care to protect their customers against foreseeable risks about which the owner knew or reasonably should have known.
E)The courts generally hold that businesses have a duty of care to protect their customers against foreseeable risks about which the owner knew or reasonably should have known.

Did Rogerio Have a Duty to Provide Assistance to Tamika