What was the ruling of the court in the case of Welge v.Planters Lifesavers Co. ,the case in which the plaintiff injured his hand when a jar containing peanuts broke?
A) That the case would be dismissed because the plaintiff could not establish that the jar was maintained in a pristine condition after its purchase.
B) That the plaintiff would be allowed to proceed on his claim because negligence was established.
C) That the plaintiff would be allowed to proceed on his claim because the defendant was unable to establish that the jar had been damaged after its purchase.
D) That the plaintiff was unable to recover on his claim because he was not the actual purchaser of the jar of peanuts.
E) That the plaintiff was unable to recover on his claim because negligence in manufacture of the jar could not be established.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q50: What is another name for the risk-utility
Q51: As recognized by the court in Sperry-New
Q52: Which of the following is true regarding
Q53: Kobi was thrilled about his first new
Q54: When an individual glass bottle of soda
Q56: As recognized by the court in Sperry-New
Q57: Which statement is true regarding a lawsuit
Q58: In a product liability action in which
Q59: [Squirt Gun Mishap] Marie decided to purchase
Q60: What was the Supreme Court of California's
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents