As recognized by the court in Sperry-New Holland v.John Paul Prestage and Pam Prestage,which of the following is true regarding the consumer expectations test for product defect?
A) That a plaintiff cannot recover if a reasonable person would conclude that the danger in fact of the product,whether foreseeable or not,outweighs the utility of the product.
B) That if the plaintiff,applying the knowledge of an ordinary consumer,sees the danger and can appreciate that danger,then he cannot recover for any injury resulting from that appreciated danger.
C) That a plaintiff may only recover if consumer oriented household goods are involved.
D) That a plaintiff may only recover if the plaintiff was the purchaser of the product causing injury.
E) That a plaintiff may only recover if the plaintiff reasonably expected the manufacturer to have insurance,that the manufacturer did have insurance of the type to cover the injury at issue,and that the plaintiff had no part in causing the injury.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q46: What was the result in the case
Q47: Which statement is true regarding any assertion
Q48: [Allergy Injuries] Drug company ABC Drugs introduced
Q49: Which of the following tests is set
Q50: What is another name for the risk-utility
Q52: Which of the following is true regarding
Q53: Kobi was thrilled about his first new
Q54: When an individual glass bottle of soda
Q55: What was the ruling of the court
Q56: As recognized by the court in Sperry-New
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents