Which statement is true regarding any assertion by Rachel's parents that a warning should have been affixed to the product itself to warn adults as well as children?
A) Most state laws provide that manufacturers are not required to affix warnings directly to a product.
B) If parties other than the original purchasers will likely use the product,a warning should be placed directly on the product itself.
C) Court cases hold that warnings on a product are not required so long as the purchaser is given an instructional pamphlet setting forth warnings.
D) There is a federal law that provides that manufacturers are not required to affix warnings directly to a product.
E) Rachel's parents cannot complain because they did not purchase the squirt gun.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q42: Under the Restatement Third)of Torts,which of the
Q43: Which of the following causes of action
Q44: Which statement is true regarding warnings and
Q45: When a plaintiff cannot trace an injury
Q46: What was the result in the case
Q48: [Allergy Injuries] Drug company ABC Drugs introduced
Q49: Which of the following tests is set
Q50: What is another name for the risk-utility
Q51: As recognized by the court in Sperry-New
Q52: Which of the following is true regarding
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents