[Irresponsible Teen] Rose is 17 in a state where majority age is 18.She purchased a prom dress from Your Special Day.She wore it to the prom and then attempted to return it to the store,claiming that she was a minor and that she was entitled to a refund.The dress had clearly been worn and had a purple stain which Rose claimed was from grape juice.Additionally,a few days before she turned 18,Rose purchased a used car from Sal's Car Savings.She had a deal whereby she paid $100 per month on the car.She drove the car and made payments for six months after she turned 18.Rose then returned the car to Sal's Car Savings,informed the owner that she was under 18 when she entered into the contract to purchase the car,and told the owner that she was returning the car for a full refund.Sal's Car Savings claimed the car was a necessity.Rose and her parents disagreed claiming that the parents were ready and willing to provide a car to Rose,and that she only purchased the car from Sal's Car Savings because she liked that particular style and color.When purchases of the dress and car were made,the sellers knew that Rose was under the age of 18.
-Which statement about Rose's attempt to return the damaged dress is true?

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

A)A number of states have modified the duty of the minor on disaffirmance,holding that the minor has a duty of restitution,requiring that she or he place the competent party back in the position that party was in at the time the contract was made.
B)A number of states have modified the duty of the minor on disaffirmance,holding that the minor has a duty of restitution,requiring that she or he place the competent party back in the position that party was in at the time the contract was made.
C)A number of states have modified the duty of the minor on disaffirmance,holding that the minor has a duty of restitution,requiring that she or he place the competent party back in the position that party was in at the time the contract was made.
D)A number of states have modified the duty of the minor on disaffirmance,holding that the minor has a duty of restitution,requiring that she or he place the competent party back in the position that party was in at the time the contract was made.
E)A number of states have modified the duty of the minor on disaffirmance,holding that the minor has a duty of restitution,requiring that she or he place the competent party back in the position that party was in at the time the contract was made.

[Irresponsible Teen] Rose Is 17 in a State Where Majority