Which of the following is true regarding Rose and her parents asserting that the car was a necessary?
A) Even if a minor disaffirms a contract for a necessary,the minor will still be held liable for the reasonable value of the necessary.
B) Whether or not parents would buy the item at issue is irrelevant in addressing a claim that an item was a necessary.
C) A minor may not disaffirm a contract for a frivolous matter that is clearly not required.
D) The claim will have no effect because the law does not recognize the concept of necessaries when minors are involved.
E) Social status is irrelevant as a matter of law in addressing a claim that an item was a necessary.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q41: What is the maximum interest rate in
Q42: Payton gets a job as a salesman
Q43: Which of the following are contracts that
Q44: How many states have statutes requiring that
Q45: A party who claims that he or
Q47: A[n] contract is one requiring complete performance
Q48: [Irresponsible Teen] Rose is 17 in a
Q49: If a licensing statute is intended to
Q50: The term _ refers to the fact
Q51: How many states engage in at least
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents