The Text Discusses the Case of Landshire Food Service,Inc

The text discusses the case of Landshire Food Service,Inc. ,v.Coghill,where the defendant,Coghill,sold his Rolls Royce to Bellman who paid with a forged cashier's check.Meanwhile,Hyken,an innocent purchaser for value,purchased the car from Bellman before the fraud was discovered.What was the result of this case?

A) The car was ordered sold with Coghill and Hyken to split the proceeds.
B) Hyken was entitled to the vehicle because although a person who procures title through fraud receives a void title,the person guilty of fraud may transfer good title to a bona fide purchaser.
C) Hyken was entitled to the vehicle because a person who procures title through fraud receives voidable title and is able to transfer good title to a bona fide purchaser.
D) Coghill was entitled to return of the vehicle because the contract with Bellman was voidable by Coghill.
E) Coghill was entitled to return of the vehicle because the contract with Bellman was void.