What was the court's ruling in Fambrough v.Wal-Mart Stores,Inc. ,the case in the text regarding an effort by users of an ATM machine to recover fees charged when using the machine at Wal-Mart stores?
A) Since Wal-Mart employees could testify that a warning was posted on the ATM machines that a fee will be charged,Wal-Mart was not liable.
B) Although Wal-Mart employees had no personal knowledge of whether a warning that a fee would be charged was posted on the outside of the ATM machines,Wal-Mart was still protected by the Safe Harbor defense.
C) Since Wal-Mart employees had no personal knowledge of whether a warning that a fee would be charged was posted on the outside of the ATM machines,Wal-Mart was not protected by the Safe Harbor defense.
D) Since Wal-Mart posted a warning on the ATM machines that a fee will be charged,Wal-Mart was not liable.
E) Since Wal-Mart posted a warning on the ATM machines that a fee will be charged,Wal-Mart was protected by the Safe Harbor defense.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q75: Which of the following is true about
Q76: Which statement is correct regarding whether Tom
Q77: Which statement is correct regarding the bank
Q78: Which statement is true regarding the bank
Q79: [Employee Theft] Tom operates a hardware store.Tom
Q81: Is the bank required to stop payment
Q83: Is Ariel correct that the EFT charges
Q84: [Three Checks] On January 1,Jerome writes two
Q85: Did the bank properly dishonor the check
Q87: What are the six requirements for a
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents