Is Ariel correct that the EFT charges for the magazine subscription should be removed because it was not authorized?
A) No,even if she gave her personal ID number to the unauthorized party,the charge should be removed so long as she notified the bank of the error within 60 days and she did not receive the magazines.
B) Yes,as long as she did not give her personal ID number to the unauthorized party and she notified the bank of the error within 60 days,then the charge should be removed since she did not receive the magazines.
C) Yes,because Ariel did not authorize the payment,regardless of whether she received the magazines.
D) No,even if she received the magazines,the charge should be removed so long as she notified the bank of the error within 60 days.
E) Yes,but only if Ariel can prove that she did not authorize the payment and that she did not receive the magazines.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q78: Which statement is true regarding the bank
Q79: [Employee Theft] Tom operates a hardware store.Tom
Q80: What was the court's ruling in Fambrough
Q81: Is the bank required to stop payment
Q84: [Three Checks] On January 1,Jerome writes two
Q85: Did the bank properly dishonor the check
Q85: Henry buys Frank's used car for $5,000.
Q86: Who is responsible for the check to
Q87: What are the six requirements for a
Q88: As set forth in the text, what
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents