The case of Ermogenous v Greek Orthodox Community of South Australia Incorporated (2001) 209 CLR 95 is authority for the principle that:
A) Intention to create an enforceable agreement remains an essential precondition to contractual liability in Australia.
B) The category of social or domestic agreements now includes religious institutions.
C) The existence of intention to create an enforceable agreement is a question of fact.
D) Intention to create an enforceable agreement is no longer an essential precondition to contractual liability in Australia.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1: Domestic agreements can never be binding.
Q2: The existence or an intention to create
Q3: In which of the following cases did
Q3: In which type of agreement is the
Q5: A 'rebuttable' presumption is:
A) One which can
Q6: In which of the following cases did
Q12: By including the wording 'this agreement is
Q19: Explain the two legal presumptions that assist
Q25: The law presumes that in social agreements
Q26: In relation to the question of whether
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents