What was the argument brought forward in the case of League of United Latin American Citizens v. Mattox in 1989?
A) Countywide election of judges in Texas diluted the strength of minority voters and violated the Voting Rights Act.
B) Statewide election of Texas Supreme Court judges weakened the ability of Hispanic voters.
C) Citywide election of mayors was racially detrimental to minorities and violated the Voting Rights Act.
D) Countywide election of county commissioners was racially biased and therefore weakened the strength of minority representation in those positions.
E) Legislative redistricting in the state of Texas was so racially biased that it violated the Voting Rights Act.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q22: Which of the following is not a
Q23: What is the particular problem in Texas
Q24: Appealing a case to the federal courts
Q26: In what year did we see the
Q28: What was the ruling of the Fifth
Q28: Why is it difficult for voters to
Q29: Why does it typically cost more money
Q30: A common benefit in elections is having
Q31: In what year were there no Democratic
Q39: What percentage of the state judges nationwide
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents