Opponents of CSR (Corporate Social Responsibility)argue that firms who use their profits to promote social causes are not being fair to investors who provided the funds for the purpose of financial gain.
Critics,including the late Milton Friedman believe that a firm is first and foremost responsible to its owners (investors)who provided the funds for growth and financial gain.Some go so far as to say that the act is essentially "stealing from investors."

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Opponents of CSR believe that investing in social causes takes away from the primary goal of a firm - making profits for shareholders. They argue that using company funds for anything other than maximizing shareholder wealth is unfair to the investors who provided the capital. Critics like Milton Friedman have argued that any social responsibility undertaken by firms should be done voluntarily, rather than mandated by law, and should not come at the expense of shareholder returns. Therefore, they believe that investing in social causes is essentially taking away from shareholder value and can be seen as "stealing from investors."

Opponents of CSR (Corporate Social Responsibility)argue That Firms Who Use