With the emergence of comparative negligence and comparative fault, some states have eliminated assumption of risk as a defense. Does this mean that the plaintiff' of the risk and his voluntary acceptance of it have no role to play in negligence law? Why or why not?
Correct Answer:
Verified
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q41: You are walking down a street and
Q44: People who engage in abnormally dangerous activities:
A)
Q47: Fred Sweet runs dancing classes for middle-aged
Q50: You are standing on a street corner.
Q51: State X has a law requiring that
Q52: What is a provision in a contract
Q54: A legal theory that imposes liability even
Q57: Which of the following is a criticism
Q72: Today,a tort reformer is someone who wants
Q75: The most important example of strict liability
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents