If it rains tomorrow,then I'm not going to the baseball game.I did not go to the baseball game.So,it must have rained.This type of argument is called _______,and the conclusion,"It must have rained," is

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

This argument is an example of affirming the consequent, which is a logical fallacy. The original statement was "If it rains, then I'm not going to the baseball game." The conclusion, "It must have rained," is drawn from the fact that the person did not go to the game. However, not going to the game could happen for reasons other than rain, making the conclusion invalid.

If It Rains Tomorrow,then I'm Not Going to the Baseball