How does the perspective of the city as a growth machine counter the Burgess urban ecology model?
A) It denies the role of private property, whereas the Burgess model does not.
B) It denies the role of taxes as drivers of city growth, whereas tax policy is integral to the Burgess model.
C) It recognizes the role of political and economic forces, whereas the Burgess model does not.
D) It recognizes the role of key social institutions, whereas the Burgess model fails to consider them.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The perspective of the city as a growth machine emphasizes the role of political and economic forces in driving city growth, such as the influence of business interests and government policies. In contrast, the Burgess urban ecology model focuses on the natural growth and development of the city based on factors such as population density and land use. The growth machine perspective therefore counters the Burgess model by emphasizing the importance of external, man-made factors in shaping the direction and pace of urban development, rather than just natural ecological principles. Choices A, B, and D are not accurate because they do not accurately describe the differences between the two models.

How Does the Perspective of the City as a Growth