What was the court's ruling in Lefkowitz v. Great Minneapolis Surplus Store?
A) The offer was modified by a "house rule" to effect that only women were qualified to receive bargains advertised.
B) The value of the articles was speculative and uncertain.
C) The advertisement offering the merchandise for sale was a unilateral offer, which can be withdrawn without notice.
D) The advertiser has no right, after acceptance, to impose arbitrary conditions contained in the published offer.
E) Advertisements are not construed as offers.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q23: According to law, what are the ways
Q24: Better Baker telephoned Dubious, of Dubious Used
Q25: Better Baker telephoned Dubious, of Dubious Used
Q26: The mailbox rule:
A) has a lineage tracing
Q27: Karen offers to sell Gary 100 stocks
Q28: According to Section 69 of The Restatement,
Q29: In what situations are acceptances effective?
Q30: What was the court's decision in Lucy
Q31: According to the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act
Q32: a(n. _ is a UCC option made
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents