In O'Connor v. Consolidated Coin Caterers, the U.S. Supreme Court held that:
A) a plaintiff is not precluded from stating a claim for age discrimination if the person receiving the workplace benefit that had been sought by the plaintiff was a younger individual, even if the younger individual is over 40 years of age.
B) a plaintiff is precluded from stating a claim for age discrimination if the person receiving the workplace benefit that had been sought by the plaintiff was a younger individual who is also over 40 years of age.
C) claims of disparate impact discrimination are not recognized under the ADEA.
D) an act which violates ERISA will, as a matter of law, violate the ADEA.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q30: Protection against "reverse discrimination" under the Age
Q31: In Oubre v. Entergy Operations, Inc., the
Q32: Murphy has been turned down for a
Q33: A trait other than age, which is
Q34: Steve is 28 years old and Edie
Q36: The Older Workers' Benefit Protection Act of
Q37: Remedies available in an age discrimination claim
Q38: Skepticism exists regarding the use of statistics
Q39: Connie, aged 47, is a supervisory field
Q40: Principle enforcement of the ADEA is by:
A)
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents