Thomas hires Desai, an alien, to work for his firm. When he hired Desai, he required Desai to produce the statutorily required documents demonstrating his right to work in the U.S. The documents were clever forgeries, and Desai is actually an illegal alien.
A) Thomas cannot raise the fact that he required Desai to produce the statutorily required documents demonstrating his right to work in the U.S., and that the documents were clever forgeries as an affirmative defense to liability under IRCA.
B) Thomas can raise the fact that he required Desai to produce the statutorily required documents demonstrating his right to work in the U.S., and that the documents were clever forgeries as an affirmative defense to liability under IRCA.
C) Thomas can raise the fact that he required Desai to produce the statutorily required documents demonstrating his right to work in the U.S., and that the documents were clever forgeries as an affirmative defense to liability under IRCA, only if he can also show that he relied, in good faith, on the genuineness of the documents.
D) Thomas is liable for Desai's subsequent loss of the right to work if the right to work existed at the time of the hire.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q16: 42 U.S.C. sec. 1981 does not apply
Q17: An employee will have a claim for
Q18: Citizenship and national origin are synonymous.
Q19: IRCA sets forth civil and criminal penalties
Q20: Under the IRCA, employers with 4 through
Q22: Omar Khaleel applied for a job as
Q23: Joe is a white male and was
Q24: The Immigration Reform and Control Act (IRCA)
Q25: Virtually all of the non-U.S. citizens in
Q26: In Espinoza v. Farah Manufacturing Co., the
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents