Mr. Johnson, a white male, testified for the plaintiffs in a racial discrimination lawsuit brought by a black female employee against his employer, Security Bank. He had been advised by his manager not to get involved. Shortly thereafter, Mr. Johnson was fired.
A) Mr. Johnson has no case for retaliatory discharge because he is not a member of the protected class.
B) Mr. Johnson has no case for retaliatory discharge because merely testifying on behalf of someone else is insufficient involvement in a discrimination lawsuit to get protection against retaliatory discharge under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act.
C) Mr. Johnson has no case for retaliatory discharge because he is an employment-at-will employee.
D) Mr. Johnson may have a case because Title VII of the Civil Rights Act protects an employee who participates in any manner in an investigation, proceeding or hearing on a colleague's complaint of discrimination.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q11: An employer can successfully defend a charge
Q12: Hannah Bing was hired by Friendly Catering
Q13: Questions asked during idle conversational chat during
Q14: Ms. Lee was employed as a secretary
Q15: Mr. Jones was employed by Barker Sock
Q17: Cortney was employed at Brunson County Elementary
Q18: The employment-at-will doctrine means that
A) An actor
Q19: Promissory Estoppel is an exception to the
Q20: Punitive damages are permitted in Title VII
Q21: Harrison works in a cubicle at a
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents