Which of the following was the result in In re Hydro-Action Inc.,the bankruptcy case in the text involving whether a claimant was entitled to a lien upon a conveyor belt system that it installed?
A) The court found that a lien was foreclosed because the claimant did not qualify as a mechanic, artisan, or materialman.
B) The court found that a lien was foreclosed because the transaction did not involve the manufacturing or repairing of an "article" or "building" as required under applicable law.
C) The court found that a lien was foreclosed because the bankruptcy trustee had priority.
D) The court found that a lien was available because the claimant qualified as a materialman engaged in manufacturing an article for the debtor thereby satisfying applicable law.
E) The court found that a lien was available because under principles of equity, it would be unjust to deny the claimant a recovery.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q31: According to the text,which of the following
Q33: What does the Federal Consumer Credit Protection
Q34: Which of the following is a term
Q35: Which of the following was the result
Q38: Which of the following is a claim
Q39: Which of the following is a claim
Q40: Which of the following exemptions permits a
Q41: What is the most likely reason that
Q45: Which of the following is a court-ordered
Q68: Which of the following is true if
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents