Which of the following was the result in the case of Webster v.Blue Ship Tea Room Inc.,the case in which the plaintiff sued after getting a bone caught in her throat while eating fish chowder?

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

In ruling against the plaintiff, the court stated "We are aware of the heavy body of case law involving foreign substances in food, but we sense a strong distinction between them and those relative to unwholesomeness of the food itself, e.g., tainted mackerel . . . and a fish bone in a fish chowder," and "We should be prepared to cope with the hazards of fish bones, the occasional presence of which in chowders is, it seems to us, to be anticipated, and which, in the light of a hallowed tradition, do not impair their fitness or merchantability."

Which of the Following Was the Result in the Case