Write a fictional argumentative dialogue between two characters who disagree about what the basic nature of reality is.
The two characters can defend any metaphysical viewpoint,including ones developed in Chapter Four.
However,any option ought to be defended or criticized with arguments.
Aside from the option you are arguing for and against,your dialogue should address five other philosophers,and/or frameworks discussed in the chapter.
You can use these as a resource for arguments,or simply as a means of clarifying your viewpoint.
The dialogue can end with agreement,with agreeing to disagree,or with arriving at a new viewpoint,synthesizing their starting standpoints.
Correct Answer:
Verified
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q53: One of the two basic assumptions of
Q57: When Bill says that idealism must be
Q58: How did the Pre-Socratics (Anaximader,Anaximenes and Heraclitus)identify
Q59: Briefly contrast Descartes' and Spinoza's view on
Q60: When Kant argues that world is constituted
Q61: Describe the metaphysical viewpoint of idealism.
Focus on
Q62: Remembering that metaphysics is evaluative,complete exercise #
Q63: What is a teleological metaphysics?How does it
Q64: Describe the metaphysical views of Descartes, Spinoza,
Q65: Write an essay on how the ontologies
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents