Which of the following statements is true of privity of contract?
A) In the past, a person was not required to be in privity of contract to enforce the contract.
B) In the past, courts allowed an injured purchaser to recover directly from the manufacturer of the goods.
C) In most cases, the manufacturer does not have control over the condition of the product when it reaches the buyer's hands and should not be held liable for any defects in it.
D) In most states, the buyer is permitted to sue both the retailer and the manufacturer in the same suit.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

In the past, the courts applied the general rule of contract law that a person who was not a party to the contract has no right to enforce it. A person had to be in privity of contract to enforce the contract. Unless a person had purchased the defective goods, he or she had no cause of action for breach of warranty. Today, most courts allow an injured purchaser to recover directly from the manufacturer of the goods. In most states, the buyer is permitted to sue both the retailer and the manufacturer in the same suit. This is true both for implied warranties and for express warranties that may have been made by the manufacturer.

Which of the Following Statements Is True of Privity of Contract