Stu hires Jan to negotiate and sign a contract with Ken on Stu's behalf.Which of the following is false?
A) If Jan acts outside express,implied,and apparent authority,Stu could still approve the contract and be bound by it.
B) If Jan acts within her apparent authority,but outside her express or implied authority,Stu will be bound by the contract but may sue Jan for breach of her agency contract.
C) If Jan acts within her implied authority,Stu will owe her for her services.
D) If Jan contracts with Ken on behalf of Stu but acts outside her express,implied,and apparent authority,Ken could not sue her for breach of contract because Ken has no contract with her.
E) If Jan acts within her express authority and negotiates and signs the contract with Ken,Jan is not a party to that contract.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q43: An agent with no express,implied,or apparent authority
Q44: Which of the following statements is correct
Q46: Explain under what circumstances an agent can
Q52: Joe was an employee of Sam and
Q66: An employer is vicariously liable for the
Q71: Only employers are responsible for torts committed
Q79: An employer is responsible for only those
Q97: Where an agent has been guilty of
Q98: When a principal is undisclosed, the third
Q141: Explain what is meant by an undisclosed
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents