An agent with no express,implied,or apparent authority to do so identified himself as an agent for his principal,and on behalf of his principal bought a computer.The principal refused to ratify the contract.On these facts,which of the following is true?
A) The seller could sue the principal for breach of warranty of authority.
B) The principal would have to pay for the computer because the agent was an agent for that principal.
C) The agent could be sued by the seller of the computer for breach of his warranty of authority.
D) The seller of the computer could sue the agent for breach of contract for saying he was an agent.
E) A third party cannot sue an agent even under these circumstances.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q39: Which of the following is correct with
Q40: Discuss the principle of ratification.In your discussion,consider
Q41: If an employee were performing some act
Q42: An employer is responsible for all torts
Q44: Which of the following statements is correct
Q46: Explain under what circumstances an agent can
Q48: Stu hires Jan to negotiate and sign
Q66: An employer is vicariously liable for the
Q79: An employer is responsible for only those
Q194: Discuss the concept of vicarious liability as
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents