Mr. Reasoner was looking out his livingroom window and saw his next-door neighbour, Jon Bon, trying to burn leaves. Bon threw gasoline on the damp leaves, and when he lit a match, there was an explosion that sent flames in every direction. Luckily, no one was around, and the flame that shot onto Reasoner's property caused no harm whatsoever. Reasoner was upset by this carelessness and sued Bon for negligence. Which of the following is the best argument for the defendant Bon?
A) He didn't owe the plaintiff a duty of care.
B) There were no damages suffered.
C) Reasoner had voluntarily assumed the risk.
D) He was not below the standard of care.
E) Reasoner was contributorily negligent.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q2: Stella bought a cup of coffee at
Q3: Creative Farming Ltd. manufactures fertilizer from organic
Q4: You and your friend recently bought a
Q5: The provincial government thought that the only
Q6: Which of the following statements describes the
Q7: As a result of careless driving, Mr.
Q8: Sarah Iris, a middle-aged woman, was struck
Q9: In Cooper v. Hobart, the issue was
Q10: Which of the following situations could not
Q11: Which of the following situations could result
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents