In January, a driver accidentally caused a snowplough to go off the road, crash into a house, and enter the livingroom. No one was hurt, but the incident caused extensive damage to the house. If the driver of the snowplough was charged with the crime of driving while impaired, and convicted, which of the following is true?
A) The owners of the house could not proceed in a civil action, because the driver had already gone through a criminal action and he cannot be forced to go through two proceedings for the action.
B) The owners of the house could also proceed in a civil action against the driver for the tort of negligence.
C) The owners of the house would have no civil action against the driver because no one was hurt.
D) The driver would be found liable in a civil action only if the prosecutor could prove he was guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
E) The owners of the house could also proceed in a civil action against the driver for the tort of nuisance.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q14: Clark was at Computerheaven Ltd. and asked
Q15: Which of the following actions would result
Q16: Mr. and Mrs. Hampton went to a
Q17: A person could be liable for the
Q18: Which of the following best describes the
Q20: Which of the following is true with
Q21: Trevor and Roger, employees of Ezon Ltd.,
Q22: In the case of Bahner v. Marwest
Q23: Which of the following actions would not
Q24: After the Leans began to use their
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents