Jed played hockey for his company's team. During the playoffs, three seconds after a play, he was deliberately hit in the back with a stick by Ed, a player on the opposing team. The hit broke Jed's rib. If Jed sued Ed, which of the following is true? (Keep in mind the technical, legal meanings of the words.)
A) The defendant's best defence would be provocation.
B) The plaintiff's most likely cause of action would be negligence.
C) The plaintiff's most likely cause of action would be malicious prosecution.
D) The defendant's best defence would be that the plaintiff consented to the hit.
E) The defendant's best defence would be qualified privilege.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q21: Trevor and Roger, employees of Ezon Ltd.,
Q22: In the case of Bahner v. Marwest
Q23: Which of the following actions would not
Q24: After the Leans began to use their
Q25: Read the following and indicate the false
Q27: Which of the following statements regarding inducing
Q28: The plaintiff, M, quit her job because
Q29: Which of the following actions would not
Q30: After the McLeans filled their swimming pool,
Q31: In the Alberta Court of Queen's Bench
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents