In the Ricci v.DeStefano case,one Hispanic and 17 white firefighters sued the city of New Haven.The plaintiffs alleged the city's refusal to certify test results of an examination,which would have made them eligible for promotion,was a violation of Title VII's ban on disparate treatment.How did the U.S.Supreme Court rule?
A) The city of New Haven had engaged in illegal disparate impact discrimination.
B) The city of New Haven had engaged in illegal disparate treatment discrimination.
C) The city of New Haven had acted appropriately because there was a credible threat of a lawsuit.
D) The city of New Haven had acted appropriately both because there was a credible threat of a lawsuit and because the city had established,using objective facts,that such a lawsuit could not be afforded.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q32: In the Price Waterhouse v.Hopkins case,a female
Q33: In the McKennon v.Nashville Banner Publishing Co.case,after-acquired
Q34: Under federal law,employees may not waive their
Q35: In Chevron USA,Inc.v.Echazabal,the plaintiff claimed Chevron violated
Q36: The plaintiff in Thompson v.North American Stainless,LP,alleged
Q38: Which of the following is generally true
Q39: Denial of promotion in retaliation for a
Q40: What is the major provision of the
Q41: Which of the following is true regarding
Q42: Sneaky opened a new dress shop catering
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents