In the Price Waterhouse v.Hopkins case,a female was denied partnership in an accounting firm after being told that to improve her chances for partnership,she should walk more femininely,talk more femininely,dress more femininely,wear make-up,have her hair styled,and wear jewelry.How did the U.S.Supreme Court rule?
A) The employer committed sexual stereotyping constituting illegal discrimination.
B) The employer committed sexual stereotyping,but that such stereotyping did not constitute illegal discrimination.
C) The employer committed sexual stereotyping but that in such cases,only nominal (minimal) damages are available.
D) Despite the sexual stereotyping of such statements,the employer could avoid liability if it could show that it had received client complaints regarding the female's masculine-type qualities.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q27: An employee may use the Family and
Q28: The Family and Medical Leave Act provides
Q29: Which of the following statements about an
Q30: What is the major provision of the
Q31: When an individual has experienced discrimination under
Q33: In the McKennon v.Nashville Banner Publishing Co.case,after-acquired
Q34: Under federal law,employees may not waive their
Q35: In Chevron USA,Inc.v.Echazabal,the plaintiff claimed Chevron violated
Q36: The plaintiff in Thompson v.North American Stainless,LP,alleged
Q37: In the Ricci v.DeStefano case,one Hispanic and
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents