In the Garcetti V

In the Garcetti v.Ceballos case,Ceballos,a deputy district attorney with Garcetti's Los Angeles District Attorney's office,wrote a memo to his supervisors recommending they dismiss a case based on factual inaccuracies in the affidavit that secured a search warrant.Thereafter,Ceballos claimed he suffered retaliation and denial of promotion,and filed suit against the DA's office claiming violations of his First,Fourth,and Fifth Amendment rights.The U.S.Supreme Court held:

A) against Ceballos,finding that his First Amendment right was not violated because he breached the attorney-client confidentiality agreement.
B) against Garcetti,finding that the DA's office had violated the federal whistleblower statute.
C) against Ceballos,finding that his First Amendment right was not violated because Ceballos spoke as an employee of the DA's office,not as a citizen.
D) against Garcetti,finding that Ceballos' First Amendment rights were violated because Ceballos spoke as an employee of the DA's office,protecting the public.